The Dangers of Social Media - Uxbridge

 X - post

Anthony, 31, has been made homeless in Uxbridge by his landlord to make way for migrants. He went to work & when he came back they had changed the PIN, the locks & moved the migrants in. He went to the council & has to upload bank a/c statements, tenancy agreement & expenditure. The migrants disposed of all of their ID. One of the people putting up flags took him in. ---------------------------------------------------------- ChatGTP could find no evidence of this. That doesn't mean it is not true - but even if it is true, it has been used to fuel hatred against the asylum seekers, when the villain in this piece would be the landlord who would have done something illegal (evict without proper process) not asylum seekers being housed). From ChatGCT

Short answer: I can’t find any credible evidence for this Uxbridge story beyond copies of the same social-media clip/text. There’s no report from reputable outlets, no statement from Hillingdon Council, and no police/court record I can locate that corroborates “Anthony, 31” being locked out so “migrants” could be moved in.

What I did find:

  • The exact wording you posted is circulating on X with an embedded video, but there’s no verifiable detail (no surname, address, case ref, or outlet attribution). It’s being reshared by multiple accounts, not reported by journalists. X (formerly Twitter)+3X (formerly Twitter)+3X (formerly Twitter)+3

  • I can’t find any local news item in Uxbridge/Hillingdon confirming this case; Hillingdon Council pages and recent council docs have nothing matching this incident. modgov.hillingdon.gov.uk

  • Similar viral UK claims (“tenants evicted to house migrants”) have been fact-checked before and found false or misrepresented (e.g., a Derby case that was actually a mortgage possession, not migrants replacing tenants). Reuters

  • Also relevant: in England, changing the locks without due process is an unlawful eviction under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977—so if what’s described had happened to an assured shorthold tenant, it would likely be a criminal matter, and you’d expect legal/police involvement and local reporting. (General legal context—no single-source confirmation for this case.) JustAnswer

Bottom line

Right now this looks like an unverified viral claim. If a verifiable case emerges (name, address, court papers, police incident, or a local press report), that would change the assessment—but I can’t find any of that.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

White racism

  Jason Bartlett @Jason2bartlett · Jul 13 Fact of the day: White South Africans built a fully functional nation, one of the richest in the world. Black South African tore it down, burnt it to the ground, destroyed the economy, destroyed the infrastructure and ruined a once beautiful nation and stole everything. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 🔥 CLAIM: “White South Africans built a fully functional nation, one of the richest in the world.” ✅ FACTS: White South Africans built a system of apartheid — a racially segregated regime that violently excluded the Black majority from economic and political participation for nearly five decades (1948–1994). GDP per capita under apartheid was high for whites , but the majority Black population lived in poverty. In the 1980s, the poverty rate among Black South Africans was over 50% , while White South Africans lived in a first-world bubble. The economy was heavily relia...
Read more

"Slavery has always existed" is not a compelling argument against reparations or addressing racial injustice in the United States.

  "Slavery has always existed" is not a compelling argument against reparations or addressing racial injustice in the United States. Yes, it’s true that forms of slavery have existed across many societies throughout history. But what matters in this context is not the fact that slavery existed elsewhere — it's the specific legacy of chattel slavery as practised in the United States, and the ongoing impact it has on African Americans today. The key point is that American slavery was not some vague historical inconvenience. It was a foundational institution that built the early economy of the United States — through free labour that generated massive wealth for white landowners and the country at large, while black Americans were systematically excluded from the benefits. And after slavery ended, the injustice didn’t stop. It evolved into Jim Crow laws, redlining, mass incarceration, voter suppression, underfunded schools in black neighbourhoods, and discriminatory pol...
Read more